Pheidole dentata, a native ant of the south-eastern U.S., isn’t immortal. But scientists have found that it doesn’t seem to show any signs of aging. Old workers ants can do everything just as well as the youngsters, and their brains appear just as sharp. ‘We get a picture that these ants really don’t decline,’ says Ysabel Giraldo, who studies the ants for her doctoral thesis at Boston University.
Such age-defying feats are rare in the animal kingdom. Naked mole rats can live for almost 30 years and stay fit for nearly their entire lives. They can still reproduce even when old, and they never get cancer. But the vast majority of animals deteriorate with age just like people do. Like the naked mole rat, ants are social creatures that usually live in highly organised colonies. ‘It’s this social complexity that makes P. dentata useful for studying aging in people,’ says Giraldo, now at the California Institute of Technology. Humans are also highly social, a trait that has been connected to healthier aging. By contrast, most animal studies of aging use mice, worms or fruit flies, which all lead much more isolated lives.
In the lab, P. dentata worker ants typically live for around 140 days. Giraldo focused on ants at four age ranges: 20 to 22 days, 45 to 47 days, 95 to 97 days and 120 to 122 days. Unlike all previous studies, which only estimated how old the ants were, her work tracked the ants from the time the pupae became adults, so she knew their exact ages. Then she put them through a range of tests.
Giraldo watched how well the ants took care of the young of the colony, recording how often each ant attended to, carried and fed them. She compared how well 20-day-old and 95-day-old ants followed the telltale scent that the insects usually leave to mark a trail to food. She tested how ants responded to light and also measured how active they were by counting how often ants in a small dish walked across a line. And she experimented with how ants react to live prey: a tethered fruit fly. Giraldo expected the older ants to perform poorly in all these tasks. But the elderly insects were all good caretakers and trail-followers – the 95-day-old ants could track the scent even longer than their younger counterparts. They all responded do light well, and the older ants were more active. And when it came to reacting to prey, the older ants attacked the poor fruit fly just as aggressively as the young ones did, flaring their mandibles or pulling at the fly’s legs.
Then Giraldo compared the brains of 20-day-old and 95-day-ole ants, identifying any cells that were close to death. She saw no major differences with age, nor was there any difference in the location of the dying cells, showing that age didn’t seem to affect specific brain functions. Ants and other insects have structures in their brains called mushroom bodies, which are important for processing information, learning and memory. She also wanted to see if aging affects the density of synaptic complexes within these structures – regions where neurons come together. Again, the answer was no. what was more, he old ants didn’t experience any drop in the levels of either serotonin or dopamine – brain chemicals whose decline often coincides with aging. In humans, for example, a decrease in serotonin has been linked to Alzheimer’s disease.
‘This is the first time anyone has looked at both behavioral and neural changes in these ants so thoroughly,’ says Giraldo, who recently published the findings in the Proceeding of the Royal Society B. Scientists have looked at some similar aspects in bees, but the results of recent bee studies were mixed – some studies showed age-related declines, which biologists call senescence, and others didn’t. ‘For now, the study raises more questions than it answers,’ Giraldo says, ‘including how P. dentata stays in such good shape.’
Also, if the ants don’t deteriorate with age, why do they die at all? Out in the wild, the ants probably don’t live for a full 140 days thanks to predators, disease and just being in an environment that’s much harsher than the comforts of the lab. ‘The lucky ants that do live into old age may suffer a steep decline just before dying,’ Giraldo says, but she can’t say for sure because her study wasn’t designed to follow an ant’s final moments.
‘It will be important to extend these findings to other species of social insects,’ says Gene E. Robinson, an entomologist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. This ant might be unique, or it might represent a broader pattern among other social bugs with possible clues to the science of aging in larger animals. Either way, it seems that for these ants, age really doesn’t matter.
Nguồn: Cambridge IELTS 14
GIẢI THÍCH
| Đáp Án | Trích Dẫn | Giải Thích |
|---|---|---|
| 1. four/4 | Đoạn 3: “Giraldo focused on ants at four age ranges: 20 to 22 days, 45 to 47 days, 95 to 97 days and 120 to 122 days.” | Thông tin trực tiếp cho biết Giraldo tập trung vào “four” (bốn) nhóm tuổi kiến. |
| 2. young | Đoạn 4: “Giraldo watched how well the ants took care of the young of the colony…” | Hành vi đầu tiên được phân tích là khả năng chăm sóc “young” (con non) của đàn. |
| 3. food | Đoạn 4: “…how well… ants followed the telltale scent that the insects usually leave to mark a trail to food.” | Kiến sử dụng dấu mùi hương để đánh dấu một đường mòn dẫn đến “food” (thức ăn). |
| 4. light | Đoạn 4: “She tested how ants responded to light…” | Một trong các tác động được thử nghiệm lên kiến là “light” (ánh sáng). |
| 5. aggressively | Đoạn 4: “…the older ants attacked the poor fruit fly just as aggressively as the young ones did…” | Cách thức kiến tấn công con mồi được mô tả là “aggressively” (một cách hung hãn). |
| 6. location | Đoạn 5: “She saw no major differences with age, nor was there any difference in the location of the dying cells…” | Giraldo so sánh và thấy không có sự khác biệt về “location” (vị trí) của các tế bào sắp chết. |
| 7. neurons | Đoạn 5: “…regions where neurons come together.” | Các phức hợp synap là các khu vực mà “neurons” (tế bào thần kinh) gặp nhau. |
| 8. chemicals | Đoạn 5: “…the old ants didn’t experience any drop in the levels of either serotonin or dopamine – brain chemicals whose decline often coincides with aging.” | Serotonin và dopamine được mô tả là hai “chemicals” (hóa chất) trong não. |
| 9. FALSE | Đoạn 2: “Naked mole rats can live for almost 30 years and stay fit for nearly their entire lives.” | Tuyên bố: “Pheidole dentata ants are the only known animals…” (kiến Pheidole dentata là động vật duy nhất được biết đến…). Thông tin trong bài đưa ra một ví dụ khác là loài chuột chũi không lông (“naked mole rats”) cũng có khả năng tương tự. Thông tin mâu thuẫn. |
| 10. TRUE | Đoạn 3: “Unlike all previous studies, which only estimated how old the ants were, her work tracked the ants from the time the pupae became adults, so she knew their exact ages.“ | Tuyên bố: “Ysabel Giraldo was the first person to study… using precise data…” (Ysabel Giraldo là người đầu tiên nghiên cứu… sử dụng dữ liệu chính xác…). Bài đọc nói rõ tất cả các nghiên cứu trước đây chỉ ước tính tuổi, còn nghiên cứu của bà biết “exact ages” (tuổi chính xác). Thông tin đồng ý. |
| 11. FALSE | Đoạn 4: “Giraldo expected the older ants to perform poorly in all these tasks. But the elderly insects were all good caretakers and trail-followers…” | Tuyên bố: “The ants… behaved as she had predicted…” (Những con kiến… cư xử như bà ấy đã dự đoán…). Thông tin trong bài nói bà ấy “expected… poorly” (dự đoán kém) nhưng kết quả thực tế lại ngược lại (“But…”). Thông tin mâu thuẫn. |
| 12. NOT GIVEN | Đoạn 6: “Scientists have looked at some similar aspects in bees, but the results of recent bee studies were mixed…” | Bài đọc chỉ nói kết quả các nghiên cứu ong là “mixed” (trái chiều), nhưng không hề đề cập đến các “methods of measuring” (phương pháp đo lường) mà họ sử dụng có khác nhau hay không. |
| 13. TRUE | Đoạn 7: “Out in the wild, the ants probably don’t live for a full 140 days thanks to predators, disease… much harsher than the comforts of the lab.” | Tuyên bố: “Pheidole dentata ants kept in laboratory conditions tend to live longer lives.” (Kiến được nuôi trong điều kiện phòng thí nghiệm có xu hướng sống lâu hơn). Bài đọc nói rằng ngoài tự nhiên, kiến có lẽ không sống được trọn 140 ngày vì môi trường khắc nghiệt hơn nhiều so với “sự thoải mái của phòng thí nghiệm” (comforts of the lab). Điều này ngụ ý kiến trong lab sống lâu hơn. Thông tin đồng ý. |
