Scientist David Hone makes the case for zoos
A
In my view, it is perfectly possible for many species of animals living in zoos or wildlife parks to have a quality of life as high as, or higher than, in the wild. Animals in good zoos get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required, and any illnesses they might have will be treated. Their movement might be somewhat restricted, but they have a safe environment in which to live, and they are spared bullying and social ostracism by others of their kind. They do not suffer from the threat or stress of predators, or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries. The average captive animal will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart, and will not die of drought, of starvation or in the jaws of a predator. A lot of very nasty things happen to truly ‘wild’ animals that simply don’t happen in good zoos, and to view a life that is ‘free’ as one that is automatically ‘good’ is, I think, an error. Furthermore, zoos serve several key purposes.
B
Firstly, zoos aid conservation. Colossal numbers of species are becoming extinct across the world, and many more are increasingly threatened and therefore risk extinction. Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day. A species protected in captivity can be bred up to provide a reservoir population against a population crash or extinction in the wild. A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many of these living in zoos. Still more only exist in the wild because they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been boosted by captive bred animals. Without these efforts there would be fewer species alive today. Although reintroduction successes are few and far between, the numbers are increasing, and the very fact that species have been saved or reintroduced as a result of captive breeding proves the value of such initiatives.
C
Zoos also provide education. Many children and adults, especially those in cities, will never see a wild animal beyond a fox or pigeon. While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeing a living creature in the flesh, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details. That alone will bring a greater understanding and perspective to many, and hopefully give them a greater appreciation for wildlife, conservation efforts and how they can contribute.
D
In addition to this, there is also the education that can take place in zoos through signs, talks and presentations which directly communicate information to visitors about the animals they are seeing and their place in the world. This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and outreach work. Many zoos also work directly to educate conservation workers in other countries, or send their animal keepers abroad to contribute their knowledge and skills to those working in zoos and reserves, thereby helping to improve conditions and reintroductions all over the world.
E
Zoos also play a key role in research. If we are to save wild species and restore and repair ecosystems we need to know about how key species live, act and react. Being able to undertake research on animals in zoos where there is less risk and fewer variables means real changes can be effected on wild populations. Finding out about, for example, the oestrus cycle of an animal of its breeding rate helps us manage wild populations. Procedures such as capturing and moving at-risk or dangerous individuals are bolstered by knowledge gained in zoos about doses for anaesthetics, and by experience in handling and transporting animals. This can make a real difference to conservation efforts and to the reduction of human-animal conflicts, and can provide a knowledge base for helping with the increasing threats of habitat destruction and other problems.
F
In conclusion, considering the many ongoing global threats to the environment, it is hard for me to see zoos as anything other than essential to the long-term survival of numerous species. They are vital not just in terms of protecting animals, but as a means of learning about them to aid those still in the wild, as well as educating and informing the general population about these animals and their world so that they can assist or at least accept the need to be more environmentally conscious. Without them, the world would be, and would increasingly become, a much poorer place.
Nguồn: Cambridge IELTS 14
GIẢI THÍCH
| Đáp Án | Trích Dẫn | Giải Thích |
|---|---|---|
| 1. B | Đoạn B: “Moreover, some of these collapses have been sudden, dramatic and unexpected, or were simply discovered very late in the day.” | Câu hỏi tìm thông tin về tốc độ các loài động vật có thể chết out. Đoạn B mô tả một số sự sụp đổ loài là “sudden, dramatic and unexpected” (đột ngột, đáng kể và bất ngờ), nghĩa là chúng có thể chết rất nhanh. |
| 2. E | Đoạn E: “Being able to undertake research on animals in zoos where there is less risk and fewer variables means real changes can be effected on wild populations.” | Câu hỏi tìm lý do tại sao nghiên cứu động vật trong điều kiện nuôi nhốt lại tốt hơn trong tự nhiên. Đoạn E nêu rõ lý do: môi trường sở thú có “ít rủi ro và ít biến số hơn” (less risk and fewer variables). |
| 3. C | Đoạn C: “While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive, and many natural history specimens are on display in museums, there really is nothing to compare with seeing a living creature in the flesh…” | Câu hỏi tìm đề cập đến hai cách học hỏi về động vật khác ngoài việc đến thăm chúng ở sở thú. Đoạn C liệt kê hai cách: xem “phim tài liệu truyền hình” (television documentaries) và xem “các mẫu vật lịch sử tự nhiên trong bảo tàng” (natural history specimens in museums). |
| 4. A | Đoạn A: “Animals in good zoos get a varied and high-quality diet with all the supplements required, and any illnesses they might have will be treated… they are spared bullying and social ostracism… They do not suffer from the threat or stress of predators, or the irritation and pain of parasites or injuries.” | Câu hỏi tìm lý do tại sao động vật trong sở thú có thể khỏe mạnh hơn trong tự nhiên. Đoạn A liệt kê nhiều lý do: chế độ ăn tốt hơn, được chữa bệnh, không bị bắt nạt, không có động vật ăn thịt, ký sinh trùng hay chấn thương. |
| 5. TRUE | Đoạn A: “The average captive animal will have a greater life expectancy compared with its wild counterpart…” | Tuyên bố: “An animal is likely to live longer in a zoo than in the wild.” (Một con vật có khả năng sống lâu hơn trong sở thú so với trong tự nhiên). Thông tin trong bài hoàn toàn đồng ý: “greater life expectancy” (tuổi thọ cao hơn). |
| 6. TRUE | Đoạn B: “A good number of species only exist in captivity, with many of these living in zoos.” | Tuyên bố: “There are some species in zoos which can no longer be found in the wild.” (Có một số loài trong sở thú không còn được tìm thấy trong tự nhiên). Thông tin trong bài xác nhận: “only exist in captivity” (chỉ tồn tại trong điều kiện nuôi nhốt). |
| 7. NOT GIVEN | Đoạn C: “While it is true that television documentaries are becoming ever more detailed and impressive… there really is nothing to compare with seeing a living creature in the flesh…” | Bài đọc thừa nhận chất lượng phim tài liệu ngày càng cao, nhưng không hề đề cập đến việc điều này có dẫn đến (“resulted in”) sự gia tăng số lượng khách thăm sở thú hay không. |
| 8. FALSE | Đoạn D: “This was an area where zoos used to be lacking, but they are now increasingly sophisticated in their communication and outreach work.” | Tuyên bố: “Zoos have always excelled at transmitting information…” (Sở thú luôn luôn xuất sắc trong việc truyền tải thông tin…). Thông tin trong bài nói rằng đây là một lĩnh vực mà sở thú “đã từng thiếu sót” (used to be lacking), nghĩa là họ đã không luôn luôn làm tốt. Thông tin mâu thuẫn. |
| 9. NOT GIVEN | Đoạn E: “Being able to undertake research on animals in zoos where there is less risk and fewer variables…” | Bài đọc nói nghiên cứu trong sở thú có ít rủi ro và biến số hơn, nhưng không đề cập cụ thể đến mức độ căng thẳng (“stressful”) cho động vật so với nghiên cứu trong tự nhiên. |
| 10. Some travel to overseas locations to join teams in zoos. | Đoạn D: “…or send their animal keepers abroad to contribute their knowledge and skills to those working in zoos and reserves…” | “Some travel to overseas locations to join teams in zoos.” (Một số đi đến các địa điểm ở nước ngoài để tham gia vào các đội trong sở thú). Thông tin trong bài nói sở thú cử người trông nom động vật ra nước ngoài (“send their animal keepers abroad”) để đóng góp cho các đồng nghiệp. |
| 11. Some specialise in caring for species which are under threat. | Đoạn D: “Many zoos also work directly to educate conservation workers in other countries…” | “Some teach people who are involved with conservation projects.” (Một số dạy những người tham gia vào các dự án bảo tồn). Thông tin trong bài nói sở thú trực tiếp giáo dục “conservation workers” (công nhân bảo tồn) ở các nước khác. |
| 12. They can increase public awareness of environmental issues. | Đoạn F: “…educating and informing the general population about these animals and their world so that they can assist or at least accept the need to be more environmentally conscious.” | “They can increase public awareness of environmental issues.” (Chúng có thể nâng cao nhận thức của cộng đồng về các vấn đề môi trường). Thông tin trong bài nói rằng sở thú giúp công chúng “có ý thức hơn về môi trường” (more environmentally conscious). |
| 13. They can raise animals which can later be released into the wild. | Đoạn B: “Still more only exist in the wild because they have been reintroduced from zoos, or have wild populations that have been boosted by captive bred animals.” | “They can raise animals which can later be released into the wild.” (Chúng có thể nuôi những con vật mà sau này có thể được thả vào tự nhiên). Thông tin trong bài mô tả chính xác điều này: động vật được nhân giống trong điều kiện nuôi nhốt sau đó được “tái thả” (reintroduced) hoặc “củng cố” (boosted) quần thể hoang dã. |
