It’s time to start returning vanished native animals to Britain, says John Vesty
There is a poem, written around 598 AD, which describes hunting a mystery animal called a llewyn. But what was it? Nothing seemed to fit, until 2006, when an animal bone, dating from around the same period, was found in the Kinsey Cave in northern England. Until this discovery, the lynx – a large spotted cat with tasselled ears – was presumed to have died out in Britain at least 6,000 years ago, before the inhabitants of these islands took up farming. But the 2006 find, together with three others in Yorkshire and Scotland, is compelling evidence that the lynx and the mysterious llewyn were in fact one and the same animal. If this is so, it would bring forward the tassel-eared cat’s estimated extinction date by roughly 5,000 years.
However, this is not quite the last glimpse of the animal in British culture. A 9th-century stone cross from the Isle of Eigg shows, alongside the deer, boar and aurochs pursued by a mounted hunter, a speckled cat with tasselled ears. Were it not for the animal’s backside having worn away with time, we could have been certain, as the lynx’s stubby tail is unmistakable. But even without this key feature, it’s hard to see what else the creature could have been. The lynx is now becoming the totemic animal of a movement that is transforming British environmentalism: rewilding.
Rewilding means the mass restoration of damaged ecosystems. It involves letting trees return to places that have been denuded, allowing parts of the seabed to recover from trawling and dredging, permitting rivers to flow freely again. Above all, it means bringing back missing species. One of the most striking findings of modern ecology is that ecosystems without large predators behave in completely different ways from those that retain them. Some of them drive dynamic processes that resonate through the whole food chain, creating niches for hundreds of species that might otherwise struggle to survive. The killers turn out to be bringers of life.
Such findings present a big challenge to British conservation, which has often selected arbitrary assemblages of plants and animals and sought, at great effort and expense, to prevent them from changing. It has tried to preserve the living world as if it were a jar of pickles, letting nothing in and nothing out, keeping nature in a state of arrested development. But ecosystems are not merely collections of species; they are also the dynamic and ever-shifting relationships between them. And this dynamism often depends on large predators.
At sea the potential is even greater: by protecting large areas from commercial fishing, we could once more see what 18th-century literature describes: vast shoals of fish being chased by fin and sperm whales, within sight of the English shore. This policy would also greatly boost catches in the surrounding seas; the fishing industry’s insistence on scouring every inch of seabed, leaving no breeding reserves, could not be more damaging to its own interests.
Rewilding is a rare example of an environmental movement in which campaigners articulate what they are for rather than only what they are against. One of the reasons why the enthusiasm for rewilding is spreading so quickly in Britain is that it helps to create a more inspiring vision than the green movement’s usual promise of ‘Follow us and the world will be slightly less awful than it would otherwise have been.’
The lynx presents no threat to human beings: there is no known instance of one preying on people. It is a specialist predator of roe deer, a species that has exploded in Britain in recent decades, holding back, by intensive browsing, attempts to re-establish forests. It will also winkle out sika deer: an exotic species that is almost impossible for human beings to control, as it hides in impenetrable plantations of young trees. The attempt to reintroduce this predator marries well with the aim of bringing forests back to parts of our bare and barren uplands. The lynx requires deep cover, and as such presents little risk to sheep and other livestock, which are supposed, as a condition of farm subsidies, to be kept out of the woods.
On a recent trip to the Cairngorm Mountains, I heard several conservationists suggest that the lynx could be reintroduced there within 20 years. If trees return to the bare hills elsewhere in Britain, the big cats could soon follow. There is nothing extraordinary about these proposals, seen from the perspective of anywhere else in Europe. The lynx has now been reintroduced to the Jura Mountains, the Alps, the Vosges in eastern France and the Harz mountains in Germany, and has re-established itself in many more places. The European population has tripled since 1970 to roughly 10,000. As with wolves, bears, beavers, boar, bison, moose and many other species, the lynx has been able to spread as farming has left the hills and people discover that it is more lucrative to protect charismatic wildlife than to hunt it, as tourists will pay for the chance to see it. Large-scale rewilding is happening almost everywhere – except Britain.
Here, attitudes are just beginning to change. Conservationists are starting to accept that the old preservation-jar model is failing, even on its own terms. Already, projects such as Trees for Life in the Highlands provide a hint of what might be coming. An organisation is being set up that will seek to catalyse the rewilding of land and sea across Britain, its aim being to reintroduce that rarest of species to British ecosystems: hope.
Nguồn: Cambridge IELTS 12
GIẢI THÍCH
| Đáp Án | Trích Dẫn | Giải Thích |
|---|---|---|
| 1. It survived in Britain longer than was previously thought. | Đoạn 1: “Until this discovery, the lynx… was presumed to have died out in Britain at least 6,000 years ago… But the 2006 find… is compelling evidence… it would bring forward the tassel-eared cat’s estimated extinction date by roughly 5,000 years.” | Phát hiện năm 2006 cho thấy lynx tuyệt chủng ở Anh muộn hơn khoảng 5.000 năm so với suy nghĩ trước đây, nghĩa là nó đã tồn tại lâu hơn (survived longer) so với các ước tính trước đó. |
| 2. Their presence can increase biodiversity. | Đoạn 3: “Some of them drive dynamic processes that resonate through the whole food chain, creating niches for hundreds of species that might otherwise struggle to survive. The killers turn out to be bringers of life.” | Sự hiện diện của những kẻ săn mồi lớn (large predators) thúc đẩy các quá trình tạo ra các ngách sinh thái cho hàng trăm loài, do đó làm tăng đa dạng sinh học (increase biodiversity). |
| 3. It has taken a misguided approach. | Đoạn 4: “Such findings present a big challenge to British conservation, which has often selected arbitrary assemblages of plants and animals and sought… to prevent them from changing. It has tried to preserve the living world as if it were a jar of pickles… But ecosystems are not merely collections of species…” | Tác giả chỉ trích cách tiếp cận bảo tồn của Anh là chọn lựa tùy tiện (arbitrary) và cố gắng ngăn không cho hệ sinh thái thay đổi, giống như “bảo quản trong lọ” (jar of pickles). Đây là một cách tiếp cận sai lầm (misguided) vì nó không hiểu bản chất động của hệ sinh thái. |
| 4. practical benefits for the fishing industry. | Đoạn 5: “This policy would also greatly boost catches in the surrounding seas; the fishing industry’s insistence on scouring every inch of seabed, leaving no breeding reserves, could not be more damaging to its own interests.” | Bảo vệ các vùng biển rộng lớn khỏi đánh bắt thương mại sẽ thúc đẩy đáng kể sản lượng đánh bắt (boost catches) ở các vùng biển xung quanh. Điều này mang lại lợi ích thiết thực (practical benefits) cho ngành công nghiệp đánh bắt cá. |
| 5. Its positive message is more appealing. | Đoạn 6: “Rewilding is a rare example… in which campaigners articulate what they are for rather than only what they are against… it helps to create a more inspiring vision than the green movement’s usual promise…” | Điều phân biệt rewilding là nó truyền tải một thông điệp tích cực (positive message – what they are for, inspiring vision) về một tương lai tươi sáng, hấp dẫn hơn (more appealing) so với thông điệp thông thường của phong trào xanh là “thế giới sẽ ít tồi tệ hơn”. |
| 6. E (humans) | Đoạn 7: “The lynx presents no threat to human beings: there is no known instance of one preying on people.” | Không có bằng chứng nào cho thấy lynx từng đe dọa con người (humans). |
| 7. D (wild animals) | Đoạn 7: “It is a specialist predator of roe deer, a species that has exploded in Britain in recent decades… It will also winkle out sika deer: an exotic species…” | Lynx sẽ làm giảm số lượng của một số loài động vật hoang dã (wild animals) như hươu, nai, những loài có số lượng bùng nổ. |
| 8. F (farm animals) | Đoạn 7: “as such presents little risk to sheep and other livestock… to be kept out of the woods.” | Lynx chỉ đe dọa tối thiểu đến vật nuôi (farm animals) như cừu và các gia súc khác, với điều kiện chúng được giữ xa môi trường sống của lynx. |
| 9. A (trees) | Đoạn 7: “The attempt to reintroduce this predator marries well with the aim of bringing forests back to parts of our bare and barren uplands.” | Chương trình tái du nhập lynx sẽ kết hợp hiệu quả với các sáng kiến đưa rừng cây (trees/forests) trở lại các khu vực trong nước. |
| 10. NO | Đoạn 8: “Large-scale rewilding is happening almost everywhere – except Britain.” & “The lynx has now been reintroduced to the Jura Mountains, the Alps, the Vosges… and the Harz mountains in Germany…” | Nhiều nước châu Âu khác (Pháp, Đức, v.v.) đã tái du nhập lynx. Vì vậy, Anh không thể là nước đầu tiên (first) làm điều này. |
| 11. NOT GIVEN | Đoạn 8: “The European population has tripled since 1970 to roughly 10,000.” | Bài đọc chỉ cung cấp con số (đã tăng gấp ba) nhưng không đề cập liệu điều này có vượt quá kỳ vọng (exceeded expectations) của các nhà bảo tồn hay không. |
| 12. YES | Đoạn 8: “the lynx has been able to spread as farming has left the hills…” | Sự thay đổi trong thực hành nông nghiệp (farming has left the hills) đã mở rộng môi trường sống (extended the habitat) của lynx ở châu Âu. |
| 13. YES | Đoạn 8: “people discover that it is more lucrative to protect charismatic wildlife than to hunt it, as tourists will pay for the chance to see it.” | Mọi người phát hiện ra rằng việc tái du nhập các loài có lợi thế thương mại (commercial advantages – more lucrative) vì khách du lịch sẵn sàng trả tiền để được ngắm chúng. |
