A
Of all mankind’s manifold creations, language must take pride of place. Other inventions -the wheel, agriculture, sliced bread – may have transformed our material existence, but the advent of language is what made us human. Compared to language, all other inventions pale in significance, since everything we have ever achieved depends on language and originates from it. Without language, we could never have embarked on our ascent to unparalleled power over all other animals, and even over nature itself.
B
But language is foremost not just because it came first. In its own right it is a tool of extraordinary sophistication, yet based on an idea of ingenious simplicity: ‘this marvellous invention of composing out of twenty-five or thirty sounds that infinite variety of expressions which, whilst having in themselves no likeness to what is in our mind, allow us to disclose to others its whole secret, and to make known to those who cannot penetrate it all that we imagine, and all the various stirrings of our soul’ This was how, in 1660, the renowned French grammarians of the Port-Royal abbey near Versailles distilled the essence of language, and no one since has celebrated more eloquently the magnitude of its achievement. Even so, there is just one flaw in all these hymns of praise, for the homage to languages unique accomplishment conceals a simple yet critical incongruity. Language is mankind s greatest invention – except, of course, that it was never invented. This apparent paradox is at the core of our fascination with language, and it holds many of its secrets.
C
Language often seems so skillfully drafted that one can hardly imagine it as anything other than the perfected handiwork of a master craftsman. How else could this instrument make so much out of barely three dozen measly morsels of sound? In themselves, these configurations of mouth p,f,b,v,t,d,k,g,sh,a,e and so on – amount to nothing more than a few haphazard spits and splutters, random noises with no meaning, no ability to express, no power to explain. But run them through the cogs and wheels of the language machine, let it arrange them in some very special orders, and there is nothing that these meaningless streams of air cannot do: from sighing the interminable boredom of existence to unravelling the fundamental order of the universe.
D
The most extraordinary thing about language, however, is that one doesn’t have to be a genius to set its wheels in motion. The language machine allows just about everybody from pre-modern foragers in the subtropical savannah, to post-modern philosophers in the suburban sprawl – to tie these meaningless sounds together into an infinite variety of subtle senses, and all apparently without the slightest exertion. Yet it is precisely this deceptive ease which makes language a victim of its own success, since in everyday life its triumphs are usually taken for granted. The wheels of language run so smoothly that one rarely bothers to stop and think about all the resourcefulness and expertise that must have gone into making it tick. Language conceals art.
E
Often, it is only the estrangement of foreign tongues, with their many exotic and outlandish features, that brings home the wonder of languages design. One of the showiest stunts that some languages can pull off is an ability to build up words of breath-breaking length, and thus express in one word what English takes a whole sentence to say. The Turkish word çehirliliçtiremediklerimizdensiniz, to take one example, means nothing less than ‘you are one of those whom we can’t turn into a town-dweller’. (In case you were wondering, this monstrosity really is one word, not merely many different words squashed together – most ol its components cannot even stand up on their own.)
F
And if that sounds like some one-off freak, then consider Sumerian, the language spoken on the banks of the Euphrates some 5,000 years ago by the people who invented writing and thus enabled the documentation of history. A Sumerian word like munintuma’a (‘when he had made it suitable for her’) might seem rather trim compared to the Turkish colossus above. What is so impressive about it, however, is not its lengthiness but rather the reverse – the thrifty compactness of its construction. The word is made up of different slots, each corresponding to a particular portion of meaning. This sleek design allows single sounds to convey useful information, and in fact even the absence of a sound has been enlisted to express something specific. If you were to ask which bit in the Sumerian word corresponds to the pronoun ‘it’ in the English translation ‘when he had made it suitable for her’, then the answer would have to be nothing. Mind you, a very particular kind of nothing: the nothing that stands in the empty slot in the middle. The technology is so fine-tuned then that even a non-sound, when carefully placed in a particular position, has been invested with a specific function. Who could possibly have come up with such a nifty contraption?
Nguồn: Cambridge IELTS 11
GIẢI THÍCH
| Đáp Án | Trích Dẫn | Giải Thích |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Why language is the most important invention of all | Đoạn A: “Of all mankind’s manifold creations, language must take pride of place.… Compared to language, all other inventions pale in significance…” | Đoạn A tập trung lập luận tại sao ngôn ngữ là phát minh quan trọng nhất (the most important invention of all) so với mọi phát minh khác của loài người. |
| 2. Apparently incompatible characteristics of language | Đoạn B: “Language is mankind s greatest invention – except, of course, that it was never invented. This apparent paradox is at the core of our fascination with language…” | Đoạn B nêu lên những đặc điểm dường như không tương thích (incompatible) của ngôn ngữ: nó là phát minh vĩ đại nhất, nhưng lại không phải do ai phát minh ra. Đây là một nghịch lý (paradox). |
| 3. The way in which a few sounds are organised to convey a huge range of meaning | Đoạn C: “How else could this instrument make so much out of barely three dozen measly morsels of sound?… But run them through the cogs and wheels of the language machine, let it arrange them in some very special orders, and there is nothing that these meaningless streams of air cannot do…” | Đoạn C ngưỡng mộ cách thức một số lượng âm thanh ít ỏi (a few sounds) được tổ chức (organised) bởi “cỗ máy ngôn ngữ” để truyền đạt một phạm vi ý nghĩa khổng lồ (convey a huge range of meaning). |
| 4. The universal ability to use language | Đoạn D: “The most extraordinary thing about language, however, is that one doesn’t have to be a genius to set its wheels in motion. The language machine allows just about everybody…” | Đoạn D nhấn mạnh điều phi thường của ngôn ngữ: khả năng phổ quát (universal ability) của con người trong việc sử dụng nó, gần như ai cũng có thể vận hành cỗ máy ngôn ngữ một cách dễ dàng. |
| 5. Differences between languages highlight their impressiveness | Đoạn E: “Often, it is only the estrangement of foreign tongues, with their many exotic and outlandish features, that brings home the wonder of languages design.“ | Đoạn E nói rằng chính sự khác biệt (differences) của các ngôn ngữ nước ngoài với những đặc điểm kỳ lạ của chúng mới làm nổi bật (highlight) sự kỳ diệu và ấn tượng (impressiveness) trong thiết kế của ngôn ngữ. |
| 6. Even silence can be meaningful | Đoạn F: “…even the absence of a sound has been enlisted to express something specific.… a very particular kind of nothing… even a non-sound, when carefully placed in a particular position, has been invested with a specific function.” | Đoạn F lấy ví dụ từ tiếng Sumerian để cho thấy ngay cả sự im lặng (silence) – sự vắng mặt của âm thanh (absence of a sound) – cũng có thể mang ý nghĩa (be meaningful) và thực hiện một chức năng cụ thể. |
| 7. E (material) | Đoạn A: “Other inventions -the wheel, agriculture, sliced bread – may have transformed our material existence…” | Bánh xe là một phát minh có tác động lớn đến các khía cạnh vật chất (material) của cuộc sống. |
| 8. G (fundamental) | Đoạn A: “but the advent of language is what made us human. Compared to language, all other inventions pale in significance, since everything we have ever achieved depends on language and originates from it.” | Tác động của ngôn ngữ là nền tảng (fundamental) nhất vì mọi thứ chúng ta đạt được đều phụ thuộc và bắt nguồn từ nó. Không có phát minh nào có tác động cơ bản đến như vậy. |
| 9. B (complex) | Đoạn B: “it is a tool of extraordinary sophistication” & Đoạn C: “Language often seems so skillfully drafted…” | “Sophistication” và “skillfully drafted” ám chỉ ngôn ngữ rất phức tạp (complex) và tinh vi. |
| 10. F (easy) | Đoạn D: “The language machine allows just about everybody… to tie these meaningless sounds together… all apparently without the slightest exertion. Yet it is precisely this deceptive ease…” | Ngôn ngữ có vẻ dễ dàng (easy) để sử dụng, đến mức gần như không tốn chút sức lực nào (without the slightest exertion). Tác giả gọi đây là sự dễ dàng đánh lừa (deceptive ease). |
| 11. NO | Đoạn A: “Without language, we could never have embarked on our ascent to unparalleled power over all other animals, and even over nature itself.” | Quan điểm của tác giả rất rõ ràng: không có ngôn ngữ, con người không bao giờ có thể đạt được vị thế như hiện nay. Vì vậy, phát biểu rằng “có thể đã đạt được” là trái ngược (contradicts) với quan điểm của tác giả. |
| 12. YES | Đoạn B: “This was how, in 1660, the renowned French grammarians of the Port-Royal abbey… distilled the essence of language, and no one since has celebrated more eloquently the magnitude of its achievement.“ | Tác giả đánh giá cao các nhà ngữ pháp Port-Royal, nói rằng không ai có thể ca ngợi một cách hùng hồn hơn (celebrated more eloquently) về thành tựu của ngôn ngữ. Điều này có nghĩa họ đã làm sáng tỏ (did justice to) bản chất của ngôn ngữ. |
| 13. NOT GIVEN | Đoạn E & F: (Đoạn E và F đưa ra ví dụ về các từ dài trong tiếng Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ và từ ngắn gọn trong tiếng Sumerian để thể hiện sự ấn tượng của ngôn ngữ, nhưng không so sánh hay đưa ra nhận xét về việc diễn đạt ý phức tạp nào rõ ràng hơn). | Tác giả không bày tỏ quan điểm về việc diễn đạt một ý tưởng phức tạp bằng câu hay bằng một từ thì cái nào rõ ràng hơn. |
| 14. YES | Đoạn F: “Sumerian, the language spoken… by the people who invented writing and thus enabled the documentation of history.” | Tác giả trực tiếp khẳng định người Sumerian đã phát minh ra chữ viết (invented writing), và điều này cho phép ghi chép lại lịch sử (enabled the documentation of history). Do đó, họ chính là người chịu trách nhiệm (were responsible for) khởi đầu việc ghi chép sự kiện. |
